Beyond the bias! Sex distribution in paediatric growth hormone deficiency reexamined.

OBJECTIVES: Various biases pertaining to stature account for a male sex predominance in growth hormone deficiency (GHD) cases diagnosed by endocrinology clinics. This manuscript will assess the sex distribution when biases are minimised. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with GHD between 3 and 16 years of age. The sex distribution of cases was ascertained according to: (1) peak GH (pGH) by groups; based on growth hormone provocative testing, (2) pituitary gland imaging results, and (3) isolated GHD (IGHD) versus multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD). The relative frequency of each sex was compared according to these subgroups with significance evaluated at α = .05 level. RESULTS: Of the 5880 clinic referrals for short stature, there were 3709 boys (63%) and 2171 girls (37%). Of these, 20% of boys (n = 745) and 15.3% of girls (n = 332) underwent provocative testing for GHD. Of those tested, 39.2% of boys (n = 292) and 32.2% of girls (n = 107) were diagnosed with GHD, all p < .001. There was a male predominance in GHD cases based on pGH or GHD severity. Though not significant, girls were more likely than boys to have MPHD (p = .056), even across pGH groups (p = .06). Both boys and girls had a similar distribution of imaging abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Stratifying by sex, we found similar percentages of pituitary imaging abnormalities (including tumours) and the number of pituitary hormone deficiencies in boys and girls as the cause of GHD. For these classifications, we did not find the historically reported male sex predominance.

The utility of a random cortisol level in determining neonatal central adrenal insufficiency.

OBJECTIVES: While it has been established within the first 4 months of life that there is no circadian rhythm, what is unclear is the usefulness of a random serum cortisol (rSC) level in determining neonatal central adrenal insufficiency (CAI). The objective of the study is to determine the utility of using rSC in infants less than 4 months old in the evaluation of CAI. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Retrospective chart review of infants who underwent a low dose cosyntropin stimulation test ≤4 months of life with rSC taken as baseline cortisol before stimulation. Infants were divided into three groups: those diagnosed with CAI, those at risk for CAI (ARF-CAI) and a non-CAI group. Mean rSC for each group was compared, and ROC analysis was used to identify rSC cut-off for the diagnosis of CAI. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty one infants with the mean age of 50.5 ± 38.08 days, and 37% of these were born at term gestation. The mean rSC were lower in the CAI group (1.98 ± 1.88 mcg/dl) as compared to the ARF-CAI (6.27 ± 5.48 mcg/dl, p = .002) and non-CAI (4.6 ± 4.02 mcg/dl, p = .007) groups. ROC analysis identified a cut-off of rSC level of 5.6 mcg/dL is associated with 42.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the diagnosis of CAI in term infants. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that though an rSC can be used within the first 4 months of life, its value is best when done ≤30 days of life. Moreover, a diagnostic cut-off for CAI using rSC levels was identified for term infants.

The necessity of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pediatric growth hormone deficiency: Lessons from a large academic center.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines indiscriminately recommend magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary gland in pediatric growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The relationship between abnormal MRI, most importantly a tumor, and peak GH levels is not well known. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review, pituitary MRI results of children, ages of 3-16 years with GHD were collected and divided into 3 groups according to peak stimulated GH levels; ≤5, 5-7.4 and 7.5-10 ng/mL, Groups A, B & C respectively. Clinical and MRI findings were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 399 children were included. Abnormal MRI was found in 36.9% of group A subjects, compared to group B (16.7%) and group C (17.0%), both p values =0.0002. Children with multiple pituitary hormonal deficiencies (MPHD) had a higher rate of abnormalities than those with isolated GHD. Children with isolated GHD were more likely to have abnormal MRI with peak GH level < 5 ng/mL compared to those with levels, 5-7.4 & 7.5-10 ng/mL. 4 children in group A had a craniopharyngioma. ROC analysis comparing peak GH levels with abnormal MRI findings showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.614 and 0.728 for IGHD and MPHD, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although abnormal MRI was found in all 3 study groups, it was more likely at GH level < 5 ng/mL and in children with MPHD. To avoid missing a tumor, the importance of imaging in children with GHD and peak GH levels <5 ng/mL cannot be overemphasized.

Evidence of Early Diabetic Nephropathy in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.

Background: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most common microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes Mellitus (T1D). Urinary markers of renal damage or oxidative stress may signal early stages of DN. The association of these markers with blood pressure (BP) patterns and glycemic variability (GV) in children is yet to be explored. Methods: Subjects between the ages of 10 and 21 years with T1D were enrolled. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were performed on each subject. Urine samples were collected and analyzed for albumin, creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and pentosidine. Results: The study included 21 subjects (62% female) with median age of 16.8 (IQR: 14.5, 18.9). Median HbA1C was 8.4 (IQR: 7.5, 9.3). While microalbuminuria was negative in all but one case (4.8%), urinary NGAL/Cr and pentosidine/Cr ratios were significantly elevated (P<0.001) in diabetic patients despite having normal microalbuminuria, and they correlated significantly with level of microalbumin/Cr (r=0.56 [CI: 0.17, 0.8] and r=0.79 [CI: 0.54, 0.91], respectively). Using ABPM, none had hypertension, however, poor nocturnal systolic BP dipping was found in 48% of cases (95% CI: 28-68%). Urinary NGAL/Cr negatively correlated with nocturnal SBP dipping (r=-0.47, CI: -0.76, -0.03). Urine NGAL/Cr also showed a significant negative correlation with HbA1c measurements, mean blood glucose, and high blood glucose index (r=-0.51 [CI: -0.78, -0.09], r=-0.45 [CI: -0.74, -0.03], and r=-0.51 [CI: -0.77, -0.1], respectively). Median urinary NGAL/Cr and pentosidine/Cr ratios were higher in the high GV group but were not significantly different. Discussion: This pilot study explores the role of ABPM and urinary markers of tubular health and oxidative stress in early detection of diabetic nephropathy. GV may play a role in the process of this diabetic complication.

The utility of a random growth hormone level in determining neonatal growth hormone sufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Random growth hormone (GH) levels have been used in the neonate to investigate congenital growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The cut-off value for use in this diagnosis is yet to be established. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of all random GH levels obtained in neonates ≤28 days of age. Neonates were divided into three groups: those diagnosed with congenital GHD, those at risk for GHD (ARF-GHD) and a non-growth hormone deficient (non-GHD) group. Mean GH levels for each group were compared, and ROC analysis was used to identify a cut-off for the diagnosis of GHD. RESULTS: The study included 138 neonates with the mean age of 9.07 ± 6.6 days, and 65% of these were born at term gestation. Mean GH levels were lower in the GHD group (2.73 ± 1.19 ng/ml) as compared to the ARF-GHD (9.4 ± 7.96 ng/ml, p = .002) and non-GHD groups (14.86 ± 14.42 ng/ml, p = .027). GH values were not significantly different between non-GHD and ARF-GHD groups. ROC analysis identified a cut-off of serum random GH level of 4.5 ng/ml that achieved 100% sensitivity and 83% specificity for the diagnosis of congenital GHD. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that random GH levels obtained in the first 28 days of life can be useful in diagnosing congenital GHD. Moreover, a diagnostic cut-off for congenital GHD using random GH levels was identified.

Multi-disciplinary weight management compared to routine care in youth with obesity: what else should be monitored?

PURPOSE: Efficacy of multi-disciplinary weight management (MDM) in youth has not been compared to their routine care. OBJECTIVES: To compare body mass index z-score (zBMI) and blood test (lab) changes (Δ) in youth before and after MDM and to correlate bio-impedance analysis (BIA) and lab measurements. METHODS: We compared zBMI Δ (from referring providers' records), within 3 months prior to MDM, to monthly zBMI Δ after MDM, in a retrospective cohort of youth at a tertiary MDM center. BIA and lab measurements after 6 months, MDM were compared to baseline. RESULTS: We reviewed 316 records (12.9 ± 3.5 years, 49% males, 104.8 ± 35.1 kgs). The pre-MDM zBMI Δ (0.02 ± 0.1) was reversed after MDM (-0.03 ± 0.09, visit 2, P < 0.001). The zBMI Δ progressed on follow-up (-0.14 ± 0.05, visit 6). Baseline BIA components correlated with Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure. HbA1c, HOMA-IR, and liver functions significantly improved on follow-up. MDM participation showed progressive attrition and dropped to 11.6% at visit 6. CONCLUSION: MDM in youth resulted in zBMI and lab improvements compared to their pre-MDM measurements. BIA provided additional outcome measures that correlated with metabolic markers. MDM follow-up was limited by the progressive participant drop-out. Behavioral economic strategies are needed to improve adherence.

ABM Clinical Protocol #27: Breastfeeding an Infant or Young Child with Insulin-Dependent Diabetes.

A central goal of The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine is the development of clinical protocols for managing common medical problems that may impact breastfeeding success. These protocols serve only as guidelines for the care of breastfeeding mothers and infants and do not delineate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as standards of medical care. Variations in treatment may be appropriate according to the needs of an individual patient.